where are we running??
currently listening to that on the radio. "where are we running?" kravitz.
honestly i have yet to find a font i like for this blog. and honestly i hate the layout of my blog. it sucks. but i'm too lazy to fix it and its too trivial for me to bother about it. so if you're reading and you dont like how the blog looks, too bad. so do i. and i hate times new roman. lets use arial. but it looks too big. book antiqua..not bad. i like. lets stick to this. the chi feels right.
speaking of chi, do you actually believe it? i use it for my own convenience. when things are going well, and superbly well at that, then i say that the chi is right. but when things start going severely awry, or if something just "tak ngam", or if i dont like it but cant pinpoint why, then the chi is off. so conclusively, the term "chi" in my usage, is not based on its original meaning of balance of the elements but rather a quick and easy way of saying whether i like how things are going or not. hmmm...seems to me like i should never be allowed to have absolute power. like an empress or a dictator. because things will have to be to my liking. and the chi has to be right. if not..its off with your head! you being without your head might just fix the chi today. *evil laugh* i can just imagine the conspiracy theories to overthrow me.
so what say you about the chi?
------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -----------------
there are currently some problems regarding preparations for leaving for nz. the police whats-it for good conduct has mysteriously gone a-missing in the wonderful postal service our fantastic country provides. (AVOID POSLAJU AT ALL COSTS IF YOU VALUE YOUR POST) on top of that, (oh great, the songs on radio are on a fixed list..its kravitz again) my friend hasnt gotten her contracts and what not. just makes me wonder, how exactly do we do things in this country? are we basing it on someone's chi which clashes with everybody elses? because its not working well for me.
either that or god or the many gods think it best i not go to nz.
which i dont mind actually.
but whatever, lets not get into that again.
------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------- ------------
stacie orrico's "stuck" now on radio. it was playing half an hour ago.
now here's another topic : BLOGGING PERSONALITY
why are some people so interesting and profound, or appear to be, by judgement of their blogs, yet in real life are real quiet and kinda aloof? makes you wonder whats tick-tick-ticking in that head of theirs dont it.
why are there some people who are so vocabularily inept that they cannot express themselves in real life without sounding like they're getting tongue tied and verbally tripping over their own saliva, effectively spouting corny, saccharine sweet soap opera-worthy lines, who think they are, dare i say it, "da bomb" (roll eyes), who think they are, and this is without wanting to sound like i'm rubbing my own ego, blog worthy? cant even manage simple subject-verb agreement! and are retarded in terms of expression.
why are there some people who have a blog that has nothing on it? i mean, there's absolutely nothing on it.
and WHY are there some people who read blogs that cant be mature and open minded enough to bear in mind that these are primarily outlets of expression for individuals? (as un-glib as they may be, or how un-interesting they are in real life) why are there people considering setting laws for blogs? thats like setting rules for how to arrange the furniture in your house, or how to do up your car, or how to...you get the idea.
i mean, some of the most interesting people i know find blogging mundane or dont blog at all.
*shrug*
blink 182's "i miss you".
i think this is a long enough entry.
merry christmas everyone. happy new year and may the chi always be in your favour and good fortune roll you way.
see, i can be nice.